A Great Institution Broadens Its
Net
A FEE Update by Jo Ann Skousen, Director of Educational Programs
When we arrived at FEE
headquarters nine months ago, in September 2001, the former
president had been gone for nearly five months. His interim
replacement had been gone for nearly two months. His director of
seminars would resign two weeks later to go back to graduate
school. Then the terrorists attacked New York, and suddenly no
one wanted to fly. Schools who had planned to attend FEE
seminars in the spring cancelled their registrations. And the
Red Cross became everyone’s favorite charity, leaving
educational foundations out in the cold. The outlook for FEE was
pretty bleak.
And yet, FEE’s educational programs are now booming. The first
national FEE convention was attended by nearly 900 paid
participants, nearly double our projected attendance. Our onsite
student seminars this summer have sold out, and we have added
additional seminars to accommodate the waiting lists. Our
home school and debate programs have burgeoned--Greg Rehmke is
attending four separate debate conferences in the next week
alone! New Friends of FEE who attended our National Convention
want us to add an adult retreat in the fall. We are literally
running seminars back to back. And our onsite list of
free-market libertarian faculty is impressive: Israel Kirzner,
Peter Boettke, Roger Garrison, Harry Veryser, Lawrence Reed,
Burt Folsom, Dwight Lee, Jack Chambless, Charles Baird, John R.
Pugsley, just to name a few. We adhere closely to the format
established so well by founder Leonard Read. We’ve even
brought back his tradition of gourmet meals cooked by himself,
with meals prepared by the president’s wife from recipes in her
own cookbook.
There are no philosophical compromises at FEE: we are teaching
the principles of sound money and free market economics to
record numbers of students and adults, many of whom are new to
FEE and to libertarian ideas. As one of the teachers at these
seminars, I can state without question that it is a joy to
watch the light dawn in the eyes of participants as they “get
it” for the first time. Yes, it is great speaking to
all-libertarian audiences. But it is even more exciting to guide
conservatives and statists to the discovery of
freedom, as Rose Wilder Lane so aptly described it. We invite
anyone reading this article to attend a FEE seminar and see what
we are teaching. Instead of supposing and surmising, come see
for yourself. Leonard Read would indeed be pleased.
FEE’s new president, Mark Skousen, is a bit flashier and more
grandiose than previous administrations may have been. This is
by design, not by accident. Quoting Andrew Carnegie, Mark told
attendees of the FEE fall dinner, his first public address as
president of FEE, “In order to make an impact, you have to
attract attention. We plan to attract attention to FEE. I want
to make FEE a household name.” This goal is not for his own
aggrandizement; he has enjoyed ample notoriety in his role as an
investment writer and
personality for more than 25 years. He wants to attract
attention to FEE, because that’s how we spread the ideas of
liberty worldwide.
So what’s all the fuss about_ Simply this: We have gone outside
traditional libertarian circles to attract attention.
Specifically, we have invited Rudy Giuliani, former mayor and
current hero of New York City, to be the keynote speaker at the
FEE fall dinner. Libertarian hero and ABC correspondent John
Stossel will be the guest host for the evening, and FEE
President Mark Skousen will be representing FEE. So why are we
inviting Rudy Giuliani, a controversial figure who doesn’t even
claim libertarian credentials_
I can best answer that question with an example. When I picked
up my teenaged daughter from her boyfriend’s house last night,
his mother met me at the door. We chatted a few minutes, and
then she said, “Hayley said you have Rudy Giuliani speaking at a
dinner you’re giving in the fall. Wow!! What exactly
do you do_” I explained to her about our free-market seminars,
and told her that we in fact have a dormitory full of teachers
attending a seminar this week to learn new approaches to
teaching economics and history. She turned to her son, a bright,
personable young man with an avid interest in history, and said,
“Matt, maybe you should attend one of these seminars.”
I should add that Matt’s mother has known for nearly a year that
we are running the Foundation for Economic Education. She sees
the large wooden sign each time she drops Matt off or picks him
up (which is nearly every day). We have talked about FEE
numerous times, and she has listened politely. But she didn’t take notice until we hired a
big-name speaker to address our audience, a man she is intrigued
and impressed by. She knows that Giuliani receives hundreds of
requests to speak at various events around the country, and
turns most of them down. But he chose to attend ours. Suddenly
she realized: FEE must be important, to attract someone of
Giuliani’s stature.
Of course, libertarians have known for decades that FEE is
“important.” FEE has been quietly teaching the principles of
free market economics to libertarian students since 1946. I
admire that. I wish I had known Leonard Read, and I’m glad that
some of his lectures are on tape, so I can see that quiet,
dignified style of teaching. But when critics state that
“reaching the Remnant, not the massman, [is] the libertarian
way,” we at FEE vehemently disagree. We want to take the ideas
of liberty to the public, because that‘s where these ideas are
needed most. And if using Rudy Guiliani’s name will help us
attract large numbers, then that’s what we will do.
This has been a controversial decision. Some applaud the coup in
landing America’s number-one speaker for our banquet. Others
have criticized us soundly. But by inviting Rudy Giuliani to
address our audience, we are not implying that he is
representing FEE, or even that he is a “guest of honor.” We
aren’t planning to give him a trophy or an award, although we do
plan to treat him with the courtesy and respect that any guest
is due. In But like Hans Sennholz’s selection of Margaret
Thatcher as FEE‘s 50th Anniversary
speaker, and Don Boudreaux’s selection of Bill O’Reilly as the
Millennium speaker, we selected Rudy Giuliani because he is a
personality who attracts attention. We are marching into the
camp of the conservatives in order to invite them back to our
house.
When another teacher of new and controversial ideas was
criticized for socializing with “publicans and sinners,” he
responded, “they that are well hath no need of a physician, but
they who are sick.” Similarly, we are willing to eat with
publicans and sinners (if that is what you want to call those
who admire Rudy Giuliani) because we think that we have the
power and the skills to heal them of their misguided thinking.
These aren’t bad people, they are badly taught people. And they
are worth teaching.
Let me give you an example. Several months ago we hosted a FEE
reception at the Blanchard Investment Conference. Some of our
libertarian friends attended the reception, and we appreciated
their support. But they weren’t our primary target. We wanted to
reach the mostly conservative, mostly Republican Blanchard
audience. We wanted an opportunity to change minds as well as
lives.
The next day we were invited to lunch by a couple who had
attended the reception and were intrigued by what they heard. We
gave them information about our seminars, and encouraged them to
think about donating to the newly formed Blanchard Scholarship
Fund. Several months later Mrs. X called to see
if we had room at our undergrad seminar for her granddaughter.
And then she asked if she could attend too. She was 40 years
older than the rest of the students, but she fit in beautifully.
I don’t know exactly what her expectations were. Probably she
thought the seminar would be Christian and conservative. But as
our staff of philosophically sound libertarian teachers
presented the principles of sound
money and free markets, she began to learn. Midway through the
week I saw the light dawn in her eyes. She was understanding the
principles of liberty! By the end of the seminar she had
registered her grandsons for the next undergrad seminar and had
handed us a generous donation. “You’re doing a
wonderful work here,” she told us warmly. “I want to be a part
of it.” Other students at that same seminar said, “This week has
changed my life.” These were students who began the week by
listing two pages full of what they considered to be
“legitimate roles of government” and ended the week learning how
to apply Larry Reed’s “Seven Principles of Sound Public Policy”
toward finding free-market solutions to perplexing public
problems.
The mission of the Foundation for Economic Education has been,
and still is, to teach the principles of individual liberty,
private property, personal responsibility, and limited
government. That’s pretty easy to do when the students are
already libertarians. It’s more of a challenge when they come
with typical statist views taught them by their public school
teachers. But we are up for the challenge. And if we can get
more people here by inviting Rudy Giuliani as our fall speaker,
then that’s the way we’ll do it. We’re going to their house, in
order to bring people to our house. And so far, it’s working. |